Establishing your brand as a recognised entity in the Knowledge Graph.
A structured approach to entity SEO — diagnosing how clearly the knowledge graph recognises your brand, engineering consistent entity signals, and compounding the corroboration that earns citation.
// 01 — DIAGNOSE
We assess how Google and AI systems currently recognise your brand — Knowledge Graph status, schema coverage, sameAs links, and how consistently your attributes appear across every source that mentions you.
→ DELIVERS: ENTITY_GAP_MAP
// 02 — ENGINEER
Organisation and Person schema, sameAs links to authoritative platforms, NAP consistency, and earned corroboration — every source describing your brand with the same name, attributes and expertise.
→ DELIVERS: ENTITY_SIGNAL_STACK
// 03 — COMPOUND
Knowledge Panel status, branded entity confidence, and AI citation frequency across your topic area — tracked monthly as corroborating signals accumulate and recognition compounds.
→ DELIVERS: RECOGNITION_TRACKING
Entity SEO is the cornerstone of modern information retrieval. We engineer your brand's presence in the knowledge graph by defining clear semantic relationships.
We assess where you're being found, where you're invisible, and what's costing you leads — before you commit to anything.
Search runs on entities — things — not text. A thing is a known brand with attributes: what it does, where, who founded it, what it's an authority on. A string is just characters Google can't resolve. Right now, most brands are strings.
When Google resolves your brand to a known entity, every attribute it holds — your expertise, your founder, your track record — attaches to your search results and the AI answers that mention your field. When it can't, your brand is an ambiguous string with no inherited authority, competing on raw text alone.
This is the gap underneath modern search. AI systems won't confidently cite a source they can't identify — entity recognition is the prerequisite for being mentioned at all. The brands that get cited aren't always the best ones. They're the ones the machine is certain exist.
→ Strings get ignored · things get cited
Every time your brand name appears, Google runs one check: can this be resolved to a known entity? The answer decides everything downstream.
// .knowledge_graph_lookup
Brand name → resolution → outcome
// ENTITY RESOLUTION
Google Knowledge Graph lookup
yourbrand
unresolved text — not a known thing
TYPE ??? FOUNDER ??? AUTHORITY ???
AMBIGUOUS — NO INHERITED AUTHORITY
✕ Skipped by AI-generated answers
✕ No Knowledge Panel · competes on text alone
[Your Brand]
entity · /g/11bc5x2p1
✓ Type: SEO agency
✓ Founder: Paul Gordon
✓ Location: United Kingdom
✓ Field: AI visibility
✓ Eligible for AI citation · Knowledge Panel
✓ Brand authority inherited across results
→ ONE LOOKUP · TWO OUTCOMES · ENTITY SEO DECIDES WHICH
Most brands fail the lookup not because they lack authority, but because they never made themselves resolvable — no Organisation schema, inconsistent details scattered across the web, nothing tying their website to their other profiles. Google can't recognise what it can't disambiguate.
Entity SEO is the work of becoming resolvable. We give Google one consistent, corroborated answer to "who is this?" — so the lookup returns a match every time.
→ Become resolvable · become citable
Google doesn't take your word for who you are. It cross-checks — and every authoritative source that agrees raises its confidence. Entity recognition is corroboration, not declaration.
// .entity_corroboration
How consistent signals build entity confidence
→ SIX SOURCES · ONE CONSISTENT ANSWER · CONFIDENCE BUILDS
The mechanism is consistency. If your website says one thing, LinkedIn says another and an old directory says a third, Google's confidence drops — it can't tell which version is true. Every inconsistency is a vote against you.
We make every source agree. Same name, same description, same founder, same expertise — declared in schema, linked with sameAs, and corroborated by earned editorial coverage, until the knowledge graph's confidence is high enough to cite your brand without hesitation.
→ Consistency is the signal · contradiction is the leak
Questions about this service, answered directly.